Tag Archives: Django

Ironman 3 Opening And What It Means For Marvel

Marvel is now officially on top of the world. Ironman 3 has opened 175 Million it’s first weekend in the U.S. Alone, and has grossed 680,000,000 WorldWide in the past 10 days.  That’s the second highest opening save the Avengers last year and it looks as if Ironman will be the highest grossing film of the year, and definitely the summer.  This is  the moment that officially marks Marvel as a brand to be reckoned with.

Summer of 2011 Thor and Captain America performed Modestly with both around 400 Millionand 350 Million , both really good starts for B- List comic book characters.  Marvel’s A List Characters are Hulk, Fantastic Four, Xmen, Spiderman, and DeadPool, and seeing as Marvel only has one of those properties they’re doing extremely well.  Avengers last year was predicted to only make around 800,000,000.  I say only like that’s not a lot of money, but Marvel has always been the underdog of Geek Properties. Needless to say it made that in foreign release only and caught everybody by surprise. It was better then we could’ve hoped, and a lot of people went back to see it multiple times. I saw it twice in one night.  So of course same situation with Ironman 3, People are expecting Man of Steel to do better, and Ironman to make only around 700,000,000 Million.  Welp once again through great marketing, risky choices, and overall quality Ironman 3 has made that in it’s first week and a half. So what exactly does this mean for Marvel Studios.

This may still be a little pre mature, but basically it means they have a license to print money.  As long as they keep on a winning streak Marvel movies will continue to out perform and make more money because of the shared universe aspect. Marvel is pretty much going to make at least a billion a year, at least, not even counting The Avengers gross. And even if Avengers 2 doesn’t gross as much as Avengers 1, it will still be made up from the boost of the individual movies. It overall increases an interest in the characters and individual franchises.  The beauty of it is that marvel hasn’t made a bad film yet, and the chances of franchise fatigue is really low, since we only get a Thor or Ironman movie every three years as opposed to every other year or every year.  People are excited for properties that were before just for comic book fans.  Marvel’s Phase Two will be extremely lucrative.

What’s it mean for new properties coming out?  They’ve confirmed a Doctor Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy, and an Ant-Man,  adaptions to come out.  Now this is where it might be back to square one, as none of these properties are very well known, but the entire idea is to use the avengers as a spring board to propel other movies to more public interest.  Guardians of the Galaxy is already selling more comic books and if done right will be sort of another Avengers except in space.  I imagine one more sequel will be announced for Phase 3, possibly Thor or Captain America, or possibly even Guardians, which has a chance of making a lot of people new fans.

Basically the Reason everybody loves Marvel is because they’re the best of both worlds.  They have the Disney Marketing Machine which will make the movie appeal to wide audiences, but Marvel will make sure every movie is of quality first and the fans will be the first ones served.  It’s a dream come true, a studio that cares about making money, but also about making good movies first and foremost, and this is a giant nail in the coffin to the other studios trying to imitate their business model, looking at you DC and Fox.

Advertisements

Ironman 3 a dissapointment?

Just saw Ironman 3 last night, and wow did I enjoy it.  I’m not going to say I love it yet, I want to go see it again to really get a feel for it.  I think the biggest hurdle this movie has is the fact that it’s not a superhero movie anymore.  It’s much more of a thriller, maybe a little Jason Bournish, with a mystery all through it.  This is not a review, this is purely a comparison to the Ironman Franchise, including Avengers.

This is the mis steps Ironman 3.  This is a mixed complaint, but the movie doesn’t have a really fast pace or great story structure.  There’s no 3 act template so the movie, probably on only the first viewing,, doesn’t seem to have a direction for a lot of it. The story is also very untraditional.  A british screenwriter Drew Pearce wrote the script with Shane Black and you can really feel his hand here.  It feels like a new franchise, and a new character.  there’s also a real lack of action during the beginning. Also the snappy dialogue is gone and it’s more of a dry wit sort of thing, so it’s not as funny, whilst still being pretty funny. The complaints that I have are more in the comparison with The Avengers then Ironman 2.  There’s also a character moment that I won’t spoil that personally I enjoyed, but I can understand why people found it unsatisfactory.

Now the positives, and there are many, is that this is the most mature Marvel film out of the bunch, and while I did complain that Tony Stark wasn’t swarmy or Jokey enough, that’s the point, he’s not the smooth talker anymore, we get a little bit of it in the beginning, but now he’s out of his element.  The humor is darker and more specific dialogue then the rapid fire style of the first two.  But Ironman 2 was too jokey with lazy humor, people talking over each other, and it really wan’t all that funny.  This is a new side of Tony Stark, much more vulnerable and frightened almost frail portrayal.

This movie is ultimately a left turn for the franchise, instead of being a traditional action movie, it’s a thriller.  As a thriller it’s pretty bad ass, It wasn’t very convoluted it has good villains, really good acting,and a real sense of threat.  Most of the time Ironman is in a defective suit and can’t fight the way he usually does adding a sense of danger, that was missing in Avengers and Ironman 2.  Also the villain to me hands down is a mass improvement for the franchise, much more clear motivations, and a plan that’s actually excellent.

Basicaly all my complaints with Ironman are in comparison with Avengers, it was hard to top and I don’t think they were trying to do that, I think they were trying to make a tony stark centric story and focus back on the characters.  In comparison with Ironman 2, it’s a much more superior film, in almost every fashion.  So for anybody wondering it’s better then Ironman 2 not as good as Avengers.  If you come in expecting Avengers you will be utterly disappointed. I’m finding more things to appreciate it the more I think about it

Will Marvel Ever Get All It’s Characters Back?

When I was growing up I was never very much into comic books, I was more of a manga guy, admittedly I regret this, but comic books are way too expensive even for me know as a grown adult.  I did end up reading a few runs here or there, but I got the essentials book for Spiderman and Xmen, both fantastic runs, and I read the ultimates for both of them.  Ironically whenever the Avengers came in the picture, I was like “boooooo”.  They all seemed silly weak and boring to me compared to Wolverine or Spiderman.

Now I’m all about the Avengers characters.  Captain America and Thor are two of my favorite Superheroes, and Ironman is my absolute favorite movie character, maybe second to Tyler Durden or Scott Pilgrim.  Marvel took them embraced their silliness and made really fun movies out of them.  I just came out of Ironman 3 and wow comic book movies have come so far. I got into an argument with someone on the internet over if Spiderman would show up in the Avengers 2. I said no that’s stupid, the amount that sony would charge would not be the amount worth of the income.

In a bit of mixed bag news it’s just been reported that Marvel now has control of Blade, Punisher, DareDevil, and Ghost Rider.  Now all of these movies are damaged goods, except maybe Blade.  While I didn’t think the Thomas Jane Punisher was all that bad, all of these movies have had what’s considered the lowest reception for a major superhero movies.  Personally, i’d rather not see any of these characters back.  They’re hard to get done right and many are arguing that every one of these movies needs to be Rater R to really stay true to the comic books.  But this brings about really good news.

The good news being that it’s not going to be too far off until Marvel has Fantastic Four, Xmen, and Spiderman and can actually make a true Avengers movie and can hand pick the best of the characters that fits the stories and easily pump out 3 movies a year.  The reason I say that is because Fantastic Four, and Xmen are also damaged goods.

The way franchises work is, if you make a weak sequel the following movies will suffer, Fox has shot themselves in the foot not once, but twice with the Xmen franchise.  First the made X3 then it was Xmen Wolverine Origins.  So when they finally made a fantastic movie , xmen First class, it didn’t do that great.  It was a modest hit, and after looking at the returns I was surprised that they are proceeding with a sequel.  then I thought about it, they’re absolutely desperate to get that tentpole.  Right now it’s all up to Wolverine, which honestly i don’t see doing that well. Personall I’ll go see Xmen Days of Future Past because I love the new reboot, but I’m done with Xmen and Fanastic Four.  And I’m sure a lot of people feel this way, Fox has a bad reputation of mishandling superhero movies.   Even if the reboot is successful, which it probably will be, I doubt the general public will care enough to keep it going, eventually both franchises will stop making money, and Fox will stop making the movies.  If they were smart they’d make a movie once every other year to keep public interest up, but nope they’re being greedy, and wringing them dry.  I give it 10 years.

On the other Side is Spiderman. now Amazing Spiderman did pretty damn good business, not quite reaching The originals, Avengers, or The Dark Knight, but slightly better then ironman numbers, but once again instead of Sony spreading these movies out they’re making one every other year.  This doesn’t work because eventually you’re either going to make a bad sequel or the public will get tired of them. They’re even talking about a Venom movie trying to copy the Marvel shared universe template.

The Advantage Marvel has is that they’re not on a time clock to get these movies made.  For those of you who don’t know, Sony and Fox have to make a movie every certain amount of years or they lose the rights to the characters.  But if Marvel doesn’t want to make another Captain America movie they don’t have to worry about losing him as opposed to Spiderman.  Marvel also has the advantage of having an excess amount of characters to pick from.  It also has the advantage of not having franchise fatigue.  An Avengers movie comes out once every 3 years so it’s an event, they’re on their way to having a license to print money.  Ironman 3 has already gotten a huge boost from Avengers, they just need to keep the momentum going and have all their properties flourish , while Fox and Sony get picked of sequel by sequel, and once Marvel gets their hands on Spiderman or Wolverine it’s over, money in the bank.

The Master – Why It’s Not As Good As Everyone Says

There’s always a festival/ critical darling director, whose movies are not quite as engaging, provocative, or powerful as people say they are.  A few directors come to mind, but let’s look at Paul Thomas Anderson.  I have a love hate relationship with this guy.  He’s a fantastic director, most if not all of his movies have gotten nominated for oscars, and he gets amazing performances out of his actors, also adding a surreal, but gloomy aesthetic to whatever he’s making.

He’s not a very good writer , I’m afraid.  His scripts have good dialogue , but the character arcs don’t go anywhere, the pacing is meandering, and there’s no real story or plot.  I guess you could consider them character pieces, but the characters don’t really change or have any definable qualities.  What’s more he does the thing that pisses me off with these directors is that you can’t enjoy the ending unless you understand the overlying theme in the movie.  The theme of your movie is supposed to be layered over top your story, it shouldn’t dictate where your story is going.  Black Swan is about DoppleGanger’s, Performance Anxiety, and Insantiy, but without realizing that I can still understand the ending and go back and catch that later.

It’s another case of I can’t quite say it’s overrated, nobodies talking about the script, it’s not quite as long as his other movies, and My God the acting paired with his direction is incredible, but it’s still just a bit off from being something I would return to consistently just for the acting.

Pacing

I’m going to try to not turn this into A Paul Thomas Anderson hate train, because I really respect the guy, he’s a fantastic film maker.  But all of his movies have the problem of poor pacing. They’re unnecessarily slow, and scenes go on for too long.  Sometimes that’s a good thing, adding to the uncomfortability he gets across with his camera work, but most of the time it leads to me being bored.  Even his best movies have a lag so bad , I consider changing it to something else, which once again probably reflects on the script.

Too Long

This is of course subjective, but there are some movies that are character pieces that don’t have a whole lot of story.  Personally I tend to stay away from them, because they’re usually one of these movies that’s the director patting himself on the back for his cinematography instead of spending time developing characters.  But it can work.  The Wrestler doesn’t have a whole lot of story.  The issue with making a movie this long with no story is that it feels like a waste of time.  Had this been an hour and a half character study and test of patience, it’d be tighter, and not only keep everything it was going to say, but be forced to get the point across more deliberate.  There are good movies that just bullshit for an hour.  And while I acknowledge, a lot of stuff in the middle of this movie works really well, about half of it boring as shit.  Once again subjective, but some people tend to agree.

Characters

In every category every year there’s a nomination, that is only given as a high five to the actor and the movie, that has absolutely no chance of winning.  Not to say they haven’t earned it, but there’s no way it’ll win.  This year we have Amy Adams in The Master. Now I’m tempted to say Amy Adams gives a great performance, but really I don’t remember her doing much in the film.  And further more, I don’t get a feel for her character.  I couldn’t give you one character trait and describe her.  Seymour Hoffman’s character gets a little more.. character i guess, but that’s only because he’s a metaphor for a real life human being, but Adams isn’t given anything to do, and doesn’t have an arc.  Once again Jacquion Pheonix is the only one who really delivers because he’s given more to do.  He’s an alcoholic insane guy, whose as aimless as the plot is.  Not to take away from the lovely Amy Adams, god knows she’s earned the ability to just get the obligatory nomination, but I really do think there are more deserving performances.

Stop worrying about Themes and focus on story

My favorite Paul Thomas Anderson movie is probably There Will Be Blood.  It does have a lot of meandering, but it actually manages to tell a real story, instead of banging over the overlying metaphor that only him , and critics seem to understand.

The Master is basically a metaphor for Scientology and other Cults.  It’s also the ClockWork Orange concept of telling a man to be civil doesn’t work, they will always be savages.  Niether one of these really adds to the story.  This movie feels like it had no direction.  Every scene was thought up from the scene before, almost as if Anderson got his favorite actors, and then said let’s make a movie, and got on the set, and improvised.

Ambiquity 

Here’s my big problem with these directors and critics.  Whenever they see a movie they have already made up in their mind they’re going to like it regardless of the actual quality.  This is the most blatant case of last year.  Now this is far from a bad movie, and I wouldn’t give it necessarily a glowing review, but to praise this movie and ignore the major flaws baffle me.

I think when a movie is too open ended when does it stop being good and when does it become flaky, unfocused, or pretentious.  My big problem with Prometheus is that nothing is set in stone, there’s no answer to anything.  Here it’s even  more apparent.  None of the characters have motivations, any constistent flaws, there’s no plot and there’s no sub plot.  Nothing has any weight.  I read an interview where he said that Anderson had no where to take the story before and no direction and eventually used stories from a navy buddy of his and unused parts from previous movies, which leads me to believe he just patched this together from separate ideas instead of one cohesive place of inspiration.

There’s a scene where Seymour Hoffman’s character makes Pheonix’s character do something repeatedly as it tests his patience.  I’m sure somebody who liked this movie would say it’s a metaphor for the audience therefore making excuses, but no then there would’ve been more of that in the movie.  There’s nothing for me to grasp onto so at the end of the 2 hours , I just felt empty like it wasted my time.  Flight was 2 and a half hours, and it meandered a little, but overall it had a character arc, and sub plots.  Denzel’s character is different from when he started the movie until when it ended.  Can’t say the same about the characters here, which overall means there’s a lack of character development.  Pheonix is honestly brilliant here.  His voice, mannerisms, and unpredictability really make him fascinating to watch, it’s too bad his character doesn’t progress or do anything definable enough to call it a good performance.

I plan on revisiting this movie again, hopefully It’ll grow on me like a lot of these do. Definetly worth seeing and definitely a Rental, which is sad.  This movie speaks to me, it’s an allegory for religion it’s got 3 Oscar Caliber actors acting their asses off, and some of the best direction, i’ve seen all year, so sad that Anderson couldn’t step out of his own way and deliver a well balanced movie experience.

The Dark Knight Is A Liar

Everybody loves The Dark Knight trilogy.  Geeks love it , Girls love it, Jocks love it, Parents love it, inmates love it, Nolan excels at making thinking man movies that also function as pop corn movies.  Fans of Nolan think he is a genuis, and god’s gift to cinema.  Detractors say that he’s overrated, and simply uses narrative tricks to fool people into thinking his movies are better then they are.  Me being Mr. That’s Over rated , Tend to lean to the detractor side.

Not to say that Nolan isn’t a genius, or at least isn’t capable of being a genius, but I think he’s a much better director then screenwriter.  His dialogue is absolutely atrocious ” Cat’s got your tongue”, and his scripts tend to have get really sloppy, especially during the third act.  I don’t think I’ve seen a Nolan movie that hasn’t dipped in quality in the third act.  Inception was going great until it buckles under the weight of itself and really lost me emotionally. The Dark Knight has one of the weakest 3rd acts , for me personally , because it falls into the trappings and just becomes your typical Batman movie.  I noticed with Dark Knight Rises , and I hope this trend doesn’t continue, that his movies have gaping lapses of logic inside of them.  Stuff will happen that doesn’t make sense that nobody can explain.  Like in the beginning of The Dark Knight the joker knew exactly when to drive a bus out of the side of a building, and none of the other drivers or passengers notice?

The Dark Knight, to some, is the epitome of superhero movies.  Personally it’s more of a crime drama , so i prefer the darker Spiderman or the Avengers before.  Now I’m going to lose a lot of people, but the dark knight trilogy do not have a “dark” tone.  Now somebody of lesser intelligence may say ” What are you talking about it has dark in the title”.

Let me explain.  Having a dark tone, means having a movie that on the surface level is funny , quirky, or fun, but on further inspection you realize how depressing it is. It also means having characters you aren’t necessarily supposed to root for, and characters who are introspective and self loathing or even doubtful.  Fight Club is a good example, it’s real funny, but overall the story and characters and the situations they find themselves in are messed up.

The overall message of The Dark Knight trilogy is hope in humanity and hope in general.  It’s got other themes and ideas that ultimately conflict, but basically what I got from Dark Knight is people are good.  That’s definitely not dark, and of course there’s nothing wrong with that except it feels like a cop out.  The reason people like myself honest to god hate the dark knight rises, but can understand why some people of equal intelligence can like it, is because all the contradictions.  The Themes conflict other movies,  The overall smartness conflicts with the dumb logic the movie has and plot inconstancies, and worst of all is the tone.  The overall tone for your last movie needs to be absolute dread, something that was pulled off a lot better in The Dark Knight.  Harry Potter was a much better conclusion for several reason.  First it split up the movies into two parts giving both stories time to breathe and keep the story structure in pacing under control.  Second it meant that we can really get a sense of looming dread throughout the series.  They even desaturated the posters and marketing to make it look like saving private ryan to help really nail home ” This is the end”.  The most obvious thing it did was kill off it’s characters. Spoilers I guess, or is it too late?  Shit even Twilight had the balls to kind of kill off most of the main characters.  In the entire Dark Knight trilogy only 2 secondary characters die.

It doesn’t feel dreadful because Nolan is too soft to kill off any of his main characters.  Your last movie needs to have character death or that sense of dread, neither work because the last act is so rushed you don’t really get a sense of time passing for suffering.  The lesser intelligent person may also say ” But it’s so realistic and gritty, and he’s Batman”  Well you’re not all the way wrong.  He is in fact Batman, and it’s realistic and gritty for a superhero movie I suppose, but not really.  Kickass was realistic and gritty save the rocket launcher.  TDK trilogy always had moments that stick out as clearly unrealistic but no more so then TDKR, and gritty? Not really if you read the comics you realize Batman is a thug.  He will break your bones, snap limbs, bring you to the bring of death, but there’s none of that here.  Bane even snaps a guys neck offscreen.  Nolan doesn’t have the edge like Fincher who would’ve knocked this out of the park. And even if it was “gritty and realistic” outside of relations to other comic book movie that still doesn’t mean it’s dark.  It’s more of just a pop corn movie then an intellectual masterpiece people make it out as.

That being said, i can genuinely see why people love this movie.  It really only pays service to people who like TDK , which is a lot of people.  For people like me who loved TDK but doesn’t think it’s the best film ever, it’s a serious letdown, to each his own

Why Tropic Thunder Should’ve Won An Oscar

In 2008 There was two geek properties that had a match lit under them.  On of these properties was The Dark Knight.  Everything about this movie was on point.  The Marketing was great, it had a great director, but what really set it off was it’s iconic villain. The Joker, who has steadily changed the face of villains for time to come.  He was smart, funny cool, and had a real distinct look about him.  Most of all he was terrifying.  Everything about this performance was on point.  The voice, the clothes, the posturing, even Heath Ledger’s unfortunate passing bled into the mystique of the character.

The other geek property which set fire to the industry if not more so.  Ironman was a slightly smaller hit, I remember when it came out everybody referred to it as ” better then Spiderman”  Ever since TDK came out there was a blatant turn on spiderman by the general public , but before that it was the pinnacle of superhero movies.  Ironman ushered in a wave of spinoffs prequels, and worked in the concept of a shared universe among movies which had only been hinted at before.

Ironman ultimately got overshadowed by TDK, but not completely gobbled up like The Incredible Hulk.  In retrospect I prefer Ironman over The Dark Knight, and my love for Robert Downey Jr. blossomed.  Later that summer Tropic Thunder came out.  A movie directed by Ben Stiller, which I thought I would hate, but actually liked it okay.  Everytime I see it I find new things to love about it and it gets better every time, but one thing that stood out was Kirk Lazarus as an Irish Award season darling, who was playing a black soldier in a Vietnam war movie.  It sounds dumb, and it was, but in the best way possible.

Now I’m going to be hypothetic as I would never take an Oscar from the Great Ledger, but let’s say Heath hadn’t tragically passed, who he had deserved an Oscar? Any other year I’d say yes, but here I  gotta say no.

Ironically everything you can say good about Heath’s performance you can say about Downey’s.  Heath Stole every scene he was in, he had several ticks, he made the movie.  Same can be said as Robert.  Only one was funny and one was terrifying.  There’s even a level of make up that adds to the parallel performances, and makes them more interesting aesthetically.  Nominations were announced and Robert got himself nominated for an Oscar for best supporting.

To me the best thing about Robert’s performance is the layers of character and irony. ” I’m a dude playing a dude disquised as another dude”.  It’s a real statement on actor’s and the ways actors get Oscars.  In some ways it’s an Oscar bait performance mocking oscar bait performances.   You have the total unrecognizable transformation, the make up, and the double accent.    Same can be said as Heath’s performance. Except one is the definitive supervillian and one is black face.  You can’t sum up RDJ’s performance in one sentence and do it justice.  It’s a parody of Russell Crowe and Daniel Day Lewis, it’s also a statement on how actors transform themselves whilst having an actor transform himself, it’s also a statement on how far actors are willing to take risky career choices for an Oscar, whilst once again having an actor take a risky career movie, it’s also a parody of Robert Downey Jr himself, it’s also a metaphor for not knowing who you really are. The fact that the Academy actually nominated this performance is hilarious in itself.

The Joker is just crazy, which can be interesting and is, but Kirk Lazarus is also crazy, and we really delve into his character’s psyche.  We get a very subtle understanding of why he does what he does, and we understand this.  The Joker doesn’t really get any real explanation, and why that makes for him being more captivating it doesn’t add for a more fleshed out character, which to me lends itself to a better performance.

Box Office Preditction Summer 2013

Now this box office prediction won’t be very thorough it’s mostly going to be tentpole esque nerd franchises.  I know the box office pretty well , I was the only person who said Avengers would make a billion dollars and out gross The Dark Knight Rises.  I think it’s fun to speculate over which movies will make what for shit’s in gigs, using a lack of real research so it’s more on the fly.

Ironman 3 Domestic :350

Ironman 3 has a lot going for it.  It’s first out the summer it’ll easily make over 120 Million opening and it has two solid weeks of no competition.  The First movies out of the summer always make the most amount of money.  Factor in the bankability of RDJ, Rollover from the Avengers, A new creative team for credibility, and 3D and IMAX, it shouldn’t have any problems taking the thrown as the highest grossing movie of 2013.

Star Trek Domestic : 200 Million

Now this a bit of a Wild Card.  On one hand the first Star Trek in the rebooted franchise was well received and got a lot of word of mouth.  The advertisements are really turning this into quite the event.  On the other hand this movie is being squashed by not one not two, but three different franchises.  Now a movie can survive competition if it’s before or after, but not only will Ironman 3 take up some of it’s money, it’s got Fast and The Furious and Hangover two major giants in the following week.  I’m guessing this movie will open around 90 Million get squashed and make it’s money internationally

Fast Six Domestic 200 Million

Once again this movie probably goofed up by going against so many franchises at once.  It’ll probably make it’s money back oversees, but Kung Fu Panda went head up with Hangover Part II and got crushed.  Still pulling for this one, word of mouth will be this ones best friend. Not to mention there’s another kids movie called Epic coming out which will dip a little into Fast Six’s pockets a little bit.

Hangover Part III : 250 Million

This is another wild card.  This franchise is literally a license to print money, but it has several things going against it.  First off most people consider the first sequel a little stale, and was just a rip off of the first one.  Second, there’s competition of course.  Third, this movie comes out in 2 months and the first trailer was absolutely god awful.  It didn’t show the premise, it didn’t tell any story, and it definitely didn’t do anything to set itself apart from the previous movies which people may be getting tired of.  I know I am.  Worst of all there’s no jokes.  Not one funny moment.  Wrong move, either film the movie earlier, release a teaser trailer from what footage you have, or just bite the bullet and release one great trailer when you can.  This might be the fall of the mighty wolf pack.

After Earth Domestic : 150

This movie has M. Night Shamalyan and Will Smith and Jaden Smith.  Now none experience movie goers will know to stay away from this movie , but EVERYBODY else loves Will Smith and thinks he’s god’s gift to cinema.  I think he’s okay, he’s no Denzel and really he’s not even a Robert Downey Jr. But he usually brings in a significant amount of box office so against my best judgement I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt.

Man Of Steel : 250 Million

I’m guessing this movie will either do Ironman 1 & 2 Numbers or possibly Ironman 3 numbers.  Nolan can put his name on literally anything and it’ll make money he has little fanboys nuts in his hands.  The factor I’m thinking about is Zack Snyder, and Franchise Fatique.  Superman already got a reboot twice and usually that puts a small damper on box office in take.  What Superman might have to worry about is competition on 3 fronts.  Kids will want to see Monsters University , Adults will want to see This is How it Ends , and general movie gooers might want to see World War Z.  Either this will do extremely well and crush all competitors or do mild business.  If I was DC I’d be pushing the Justice League Factor to make more money.  Not to mention DC has literally messed up every other DC Property except Batman recently. We’ll see.

Long Ranger : Bomb

Lone Ranger is going to be John Carter all over again.  The western genre has the weakest box office draw of any other genre.  As good as Rango was it didn’t exactly kill it at the box office.  Not to mention this looks like a rip off of a few different Disney Properties.  Not to mention people are tired of Johnny Depp, in America at least.  The last Pirates movie only made a billion due to international.  He’s had box office disappointment after disappointment.  Disney is trying to hard to make a tentpole and it’s going to continuously bite them in the ass until they learn otherwise.

Pacific Rim Domestic 200 Million.. Maybe

This is the absolute biggest Wild Card of the summer.  This movies is getting by only on the push by geeks.  I don’t think it’ll do Transformers sequel numbers but definetlhy Transformers 1 numbers, unfortunately Pacific Rim isn’t an established property which will be hard to make into a tentpole.  But it’s gun dam robots fighting monsters it’s so bad ass and it sells itself.  I prey for Warner Brothers they get their new franchise because ever since Harry Potter they’ve been pushing hard for it.

Wolverine 200 Million Domestic

This movie will probably do sightly better then Xmen First Class.  First class had excellent word of mouth and still only got around 400 Million.  Wolverine has Hugh Jackman, but it also has the abysmal Wolverine Origins which sunk down First Class.  Word of Mouth will be this movies savior.

Kick Ass 2 : Domestic 100 Million

Kickass 2 has absolutely nothing stopping it this time around.  No real competition other then Comic Book Movie Fatique which never really is a factor anymore.  It has a really good marketing campaign cast interviews the whole cast back.. AND JIM CARREY.  Jim Carrey is box office kryptonite right now, and he’s constantly reinventing himself, but in all the wrong ways finically at least.  This does everything a comic book movie needs to make more money on the sequel.  Bigger, Darker, New characters, New Villian.  This movie will do pretty well depending on word of mouth.